THE SUPERNATURAL IN THE BIBLE
Editorial
September/October, 2002
Volume 37, Number 5
In connection with our life here on earth, there are experiences, events,
and manifestations which cannot be ascribed to natural causes. These events
and experiences must be explained by referring to something beyond the
natural realm, beyond that which we know from our five senses.
The word "supernatural" is not used in the Bible, but it has an important
function in defining some of the emphases of Scripture. For example, when
God speaks to humans, when Jesus descended to the human level in the Incarnation,
and when Jesus was raised from the dead-these properly are designated as
supernatural events. They are totally unexplainable by regular sources
of human understanding.
The term naturalism refers to the system of thought which holds that
all phenomena can be explained in terms of natural causes and laws, without
attributing supernatural significance to them. For the person who holds
to naturalism, talk about "God in heaven" doesn't make sense, since God
cannot be weighed or measured, and is not subject to the scientific method.
To the naturalist, "God" is merely the product of the imagination-the projection
of human wishes and hope. The person who holds to supernaturalism, by way
of contrast, insists that God is above humans and is free to act upon (and
within) nature however He pleases.
The basic difference between theological conservatives and theological
liberals--is a difference in worldviews. Brethren Revival Fellowship believes
that the worldview of the Bible is that there is a continual interaction
between the visible world that we can see and touch, and the invisible
world that Scripture tells us is there and is real. Some seem to think
that since Christianity began in a primitive, Palestinian culture-that
it has nothing to offer us who live in an exciting modern world of space
travel, organ transplants, and genetic engineering. They say that Christianity
is irrelevant.
It is BRF's conviction that the same God who spoke through Moses and
Elijah and Daniel--and through Peter and Paul and John-continues to speak
to us through His supernatural Word. The Bible is not a prehistoric fossil,
but a living message that relates to the needs of humanity in the contemporary
world. It continues to be a lamp to our feet and a light to our path (Psalm
119:105). It belongs to the marketplace, not in a museum.
--Harold S. Martin
The Supernatural in the Bible
By W. H. Griffith Thomas
(The article printed here first
appeared in the April, 1966 issue of the Christian Victory magazine.)
1. A Supernatural Creation
Everyone knows that no law of today will explain creation. There is
not a single law in science that will account for the creation of anything.
We have to go back to Genesis, "In the beginning God created." But, says
someone, are there not other records of the beginning beside the one in
Genesis? Yes, there are about six or seven, and some of them are much like
Genesis, but it is obvious to the discerning student that Genesis is the
inspired
account.
With all their similarities--and I would emphasize them to the full-there
is one dissimilarity, and we all know that in accordance with inductive
logic we have to account for dissimilarities as well as similarities if
we wish to draw a proper conclusion. Everyone of the other creation stories
starts with an already existing chaos, which is equivalent to Genesis 1:2.
Genesis alone goes back to "In the beginning God."
The man of science thus starts with two things--for if we ask him this
question, "What do you say was the beginning'?" he will answer, 'Matter
and motion. " But we must go back further and ask "Who created matter,
and who started motion"" Even if we accept the nebular hypothesis of Laplace,
we are compelled to start with existing matter arid existing motion. "Every
effect must have its adequate cause." And this is the teaching of Genesis
1:1.
2. A Supernatural Revelation
There is a revelation in the Old Testament, given in the first five
books, and developed in the other thirty-four. It is given in the Pentateuch
and then developed along three lines--along the line of history
in outward expression; along the line of poetry in inward experience;
and along the line of prophecy in onward expectation.
There are a great many things said today about dividing up the books
of the Old Testament and editing them according to authorship--J and E
and P arid D and H, and so on, Even if this were all true, and we could
absolutely divide the Old Testament up according to the most approved critical
methods, we should still have to account for the supernatural revelation.
I have a good deal of sympathy with the man who said that the first
person he wants to see in Heaven will be Deutero-Isaiah; I would go further
and say that I want to see J and E and P and D and H as well. There is
in the Bible a supernatural revelation. You have to account for that, no
matter how the books were composed--though we may be sure they were not
composed as the critics say.
3. A Supernatural Nation
I mean the Jews. Palestine is a wonderfully small place, equivalent
in size to the state of Rhode Island, or about the area of Wales. On one
side of it was the empire of Assyria, and afterward Babylon. On the other
side was the great empire of Egypt, and on yet another side of it the empire
of the Hittites. Within a very short time, any of those great empires could
have crushed that little country like a steam hammer crushing a walnut.
Yet Palestine lasted for hundreds of years. Why? Because of the supernatural
element associated with it. And it would have lasted longer but for faithlessness.
Wellhausen said he could not understand why Chemosh, the god of the Moabites,
never developed into the god of heaven and earth like Yahweh (or Jehovah)
the God of Israel. Of course, he could not, for he did not believe in the
supernatural. We know that Chemosh was not god at all.
4. A Supernatural Expectation
This is sometimes called the argument from prophecy. The Old Testament
prophets were able to foretell things to come.
How was it that Amos was able to foretell the captivity of Israel which
happened forty years afterward?
How was it that Isaiah, in chapter 39:6 and 7, foretold the captivity
to Babylon, when Babylon was an insignificant place compared with Assyria?
He foretold the captivity 150 years before it took place, and it took place
exactly as he had announced. This is quite apart from any question of the
authorship of Isaiah 40 to 66. Here we have a statement which is either
true or untrue. It is a definite statement that the people should be taken
into captivity to Babylon, when Babylon was not even one of the powers
of the then known world.
We all remember the story of the wise men who came from the East and
said, "Where is he that is born king of the Jews?" To them was quoted Micah
5:2, and that was written 800 years before Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem.
There are many illustrations and instances of this argument from prediction,
which we maintain is only capable of explanation by means of the supernatural.
5. A Supernatural Incarnation
This brings us to the Gospels. I cannot now discuss a great deal that
we know in connection with our Lord, but I wonder whether everyone is aware
that in the whole realm of literature we cannot find a single instance
of a perfect man or woman. Take all the poets from Homer down to the present
day, all the dramatists of ancient and modern times, all the novelists
with their wonderful analyses of character, all the philosophers and essayists,
all the literary writers, all the geniuses of literature--there is not
one that has once attempted to depict a perfect character.
Which is the most perfect character in Shakespeare? Some would say Hamlet
or Desdemona, but neither is perfect. Which is the most perfect character
in fiction? I have heard Colonel Newcome mentioned. Well, he was a fine
old English gentleman, but he was not perfect.
Yet, here, in the four Gospels, written not by literary geniuses, but
by ordinary men-Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John-there has been for two thousand
years the record of a perfect life. Did the record invent the character,
or the character produce the records? As someone has said, if Matthew,
Mark, Luke, and John invented the character of Jesus, we are in the presence
of a literary miracle greater than anything that our Lord ever wrought.
The Gospels with their portrait of the perfect Man, are only to be explained
on the basis of the supernatural.
6. A Supernatural Manifestation
By this I mean the fact of the Christian church. We find in the book
of the Acts of the Apostles, and in the New Testament epistles, the fact
of a society which is called by a variety of names, but especially that
of "the Church." We know that there was no compulsion to join that company.
There was very often no advantage, but on the contrary, real disadvantage
in becoming a member. People were persecuted and put to death for belonging
to the Christian Church.
Everyone admits that it began with the uniting together of a few people
in the belief that their Master had risen from the dead, and this company
of people has continued until this day-and is increasing, until now we
find it almost everywhere-actually in all parts of the world. How
can we account for the fact that, without promise of earthly advantage
that which we call the Christian Church has thus persisted? There is only
one explanation; it is supernatural.
This is the fundamental value of the Christian church which we are sometimes
too apt to forget. It possesses a supreme value when we think of it as
a testimony to the supernatural. Whatever happens to the organized churches,
or the professed followers of Christ, the real church--the body of Christ--will
last-because, as the Lord says, the gates of Hades shall not prevail against
it.
There is no need for pessimism concerning the church of Christ as it
is revealed generally in the New Testament, and especially in the epistle
to the Ephesians. "God is in the midst of her."
7. A Supernatural Confirmation
I mention a confirmation of all the six points that have been mentioned-supernatural
creation, supernatural revelation, supernatural nation, supernatural expectation,
supernatural incarnation, and supernatural manifestation.
There are many things in connection with this confirmation worthy of
our attention, but I can mention only two. There is the confirmation which
comes from "the finality of Christianity."
Let me imagine again an illustration which is as impossible as it can
be. Suppose someone comes to me and says, "I have brought you the last
book on botany." I reply, "Of course, you mean the latest book on
botany," "No," he says, "the last," and he adds that no other book will
ever be written on botany. Well, I should try to be polite, but of course
I should not believe him.
The last book on any science cannot be written, but in the Bible we
have not the latest, but the last word on sin, on redemption, on holiness,
on immortality-and this Book has been before the world for nearly two thousand
years.
To Sum Up
I want to say, "Let not your heart be troubled." You may have the most
perfect confidence in regard to the Word of God because of the supernatural
in it. When, some years ago, I was giving up the pastoral business-to read
everything I could on the side opposite to my own. I knew that at Oxford,
and elsewhere, I should meet men familiar with modern criticism, and I
wanted to know the positions. I have continued that practice up to now,
and I can only say that as I have read one critical book after another,
I have been more and more convinced that the historical critical position
is wrong, and the conservative position on biblical authority is right.
We have no need to fear if we keep the supernatural in view, and apply
this at every point to the material in the Bible.
Years ago, an American lady was attending a Bible class in Fifth Avenue
conducted by Dr. W. M. Thomson. One day a professor from a New York College,
learning that she had just come from this Bible class, said with a sneer,
"But you don't believe this Book, do you?" With a smile, she answered,
"Oh yes, I happen to have a personal acquaintance with the Author." That
is the test the verification of personal experience, which crowns everything
else.
W. H. GRIFFITH THOMAS
William Henry Griffith Thomas was
born in England in 1861. His mother was widowed before he was born. He
spent his early years living with his grandfather. When he was just 16
years old Griffith Thomas was asked to teach a Sunday School class at Holy
Trinity Church.
W. H. later worked in his uncle's
office in London, and for many years developed the discipline of using
the time from 10:30 P.M. to 2:30 A.M. for serious Bible study. He studied
at King's College, became pastor of St. Aldate's Anglican Church in Oxford,
and graduated from the University in 1895.
W. H. Griffith Thomas and his family
moved to Toronto in 1910, where he joined the faculty of Wycliffe College
and taught Old Testament literature and exegesis. In 1919, the family moved
to Philadelphia, and there W. H. carried on an extensive conference and
writing ministry. He published 26 Bible study booklets and 24 larger works.
His advice to young preachers was: "Think yourself empty; read yourself
full; write yourself clear; pray yourself clean, and then enter the pulpit
and let yourself go."
Griffith Thomas died in 1924. He
never attempted to be sensational; he only wanted to be biblical. He was
a trusted scholar, and had the unusual ability to state profound truth
with a clearness and a simplicity which very few possess.
--Harold S. Martin